While rumors of when Apple’s iPhone 5 will be released have yet to be substantiated, the website, TechnoBuffalo, might have a good idea of what it’s going to look like. They created a series of 3D mock-ups based on rumors about the iPhone 5’s frame and information surrounding leaked parts and alleged schematics.
As you can see in this video, TechnoBuffalo’s mock-ups look very similar to the iPhone 4S, but intergrates an elongated display and a slightly different placement for the frontside camera.
TechnoBuffalo’s iPhone 5 concept is probably pretty close to the real thing. Why? Their mock-up isn’t vastly different from the iPhone 4S, and as well all know, Apple doesn’t like to make radical design changes when it comes to the iPhone. If you think about it, Apple hasn’t varied the iPhone design much from the beginning. If we had to place a bet on what Apple CEO, Tim Cook, will reveal next, we’d bet on the TechnoBuffalo concept over Federico Ciccarese’s sleek teardrop design. What do you think?
Related Articles
- iPhone Thief Accidentally Uploads Photos To Owner’s iCloud Account [pics] (methodshop.com)
- Dead Cat Helicopter (methodshop.com)
- White iPhone 5 With Chrome Unibody Looks Beautiful [Rendered Images] (valuewalk.com)
- Can the iPhone 5 Revolutionize the Phone Industry All Over Again? (gottabemobile.com)
Frank Wilson is a retired teacher with over 30 years of combined experience in the education, small business technology, and real estate business. He now blogs as a hobby and spends most days tinkering with old computers. Wilson is passionate about tech, enjoys fishing, and loves drinking beer.
Can the Microsoft Surface Compete with the iPad?
Who likes apple? We could not understand this company seems to own everything including the use of words in technology. Remember the word ‘pod’ that apple wants to claim ownership? Apple likes to regain its leadership as it continued to slip in the market. The US court sympathized with apple. No, we did not appreciate the court’s verdict. The court decision violated the principle of ‘laissez-faire’ in the guise of ‘intellectual infringement.’